Wednesday, March 7, 2018

FACULTY SENATE MEETING MINUTES (02/09/18)

In Attendance:  Stacey Frank, Mia Tensley, Mourning Pace, Ashley Alvarez, Andrea Barnett, Penny Edwards, Steve Gibson, Justin Herndon, Laura McClain, Meredith McClure, Rickey Morgan, Mary Orem, Julia Seligson, Matt Simon, Deborah Vance, and Jonathan Warnock

Not in Attendance:  Greg Corley, Bruce Kalley, Bill Leverette, and Sandra Williams

Guests:  Adam Ghiloni, Scott Harvey, Galen DeHay

Welcome and Agenda:

Stacey called the meeting to order at 12:01 pm.

Minutes of the December 13, 2017 meeting were distributed and approved electronically prior to this meeting and have been posted to eTC.

Old Business:  

Thank you to Mary Orem for the folders in our Teams space.

HIPS:  Updates from meeting were explained.  

Ad Hoc for By-Laws and Constitution:  They met for the first time in January for a day and looked at overarching big ideas which they then broke down to specific individual points that were important.  One goal is for Faculty Senate to be the hub for the college for committees. The revised Constitution and Bylaws will support that. They are currently on their fourth working draft, with everything being saved in OneDrive.  Their goal as a group is to get a recommendation for Galen from the full Senate before the end of the semester.  They have met 3 times for a total of 12 to 13 hours, with additional working sessions on their calendars. 

New Business:

Matt Edwards: An overview of Microsoft Teams. It is recommended that you download the app for Teams.  He walked us through the different aspects of Teams: apps you can use within Teams, adding different groups, sharing files and notebooks, use of sharepoint (to get to documents easily and save to your computer), stream, chatting, notifications, and Skype-like capabilities.  For any questions you can email Matt at medwards3@tctc.edu.

Adam Ghiloni and Scott Harvey:  They explained the differences between Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) and Academic Standing (AS).  Both have a 2.0 GPA requirement, but the SAP also has a 67% completion rate with D or higher and to graduate within 150% of program length.  In the process AS has 5 levels; Good Standing, Warning, Probation, Suspension (S1), and Suspension (S2).  For SAP there are only 4 levels; New/Good, Warning, Suspension, and Approved Appeal.  There is no Probation for SAP.  The appeals process in AS requires students under suspension (S1) to appeal to the Office of Student Development and Wellness and demonstrate an ability to have a 2.0 at the end of the term. For suspension (S2) for AS must send the Senior Vice President a petition for reactivation.  For SAP have to go through the Financial Aid Appeal Process and demonstrate extenuating circumstances outside their control or pay out of pocket until they are in good standing.  If this is approved they will have to have a locked graduation plan in DegreeWorks.  The graduation plan only needs to be done when a student is on suspension and has appealed.  Financial Aid sends out several letters during the semester to let students on suspension to keep them informed. There is no appeal deadline and an appeal can be placed at any time.  If it is close to the beginning of term the student will have to pay out of pocket and will be reimbursed IF the appeal is approved.  This only for Federal Aid and not State Sponsored Aid. 

Stacey is on the committee that is working with both departments and they have streamlined the letters that students are receiving.  The letters are from both departments, so students are not getting numerous copies and the new letters have specific instructions for the students to follow. She will see if she can get copies of those letters distributed to the departments for advisors. 

Galen DeHay:  Nursing faculty have several concerns: 1) just got their contracts on the 9th; 2) how do they get hours for curriculum and development because they are off campus with clinicals; 3) there is a lack of committees for them to join college-wide for overload and meeting the 108% before overload can be considered if they are working a 40-hour week instead of 37.5; and 5) required to be on department committees and are they counted toward the matrix. Other departments have similar concerns, but those concerns have not been addressed to Faculty Senate.  Galen explained that overload has not changed, the percent of 100% vs 108% is state mandated.  It is illegal for any employee of South Carolina to get overtime unless you work 40 hours a week, so 108% equals 40 hours a week. Our work weeks are 37.5 hours. Generally salaried employees should not get overtime, only hourly, but the college is unique in that they give overtime.  Anything over 108% and 50% in the teaching quadrant are eligible for overload. Related to college committees, there is a lack of communication about the availability of committees and considering the work load there is a lack of time available.  Are there opportunities for committee credit without it being a formal committee?  In the service of project work that occurs in the department level is counted in those areas.  This is at the discretion of the department head.  It has to be an ongoing event that requires a significant amount of time.  A suggestion was for the department to meet and then work their way up the chain of command to find out what the department can do to improve communication and find solutions to this problem. 

Committees:

ALT/PAC:  No update

AACC:  The webinar has been tabled.  They are giving input on a series for new presidents.  They have a convention in April.  They are looking at the results from the faculty leadership questions and are considering ways to incorporate that into faculty development at TCTC.

Calendar Committee:  They were able to change the 2019 calendar to get faculty the week off after summer graduation by tweaking some dates. The calendar will now have the 23 faculty days off labeled during the regular semester. They were able to move Faculty/Staff Development Day out of Fall Break in 2019.

Stacey additionally asked for Senate input on meetings, advising, etc. that are currently being required after graduation has passed and faculty are supposed to be on break. This is also being considered for up and coming calendars.

Leading Edge:  No meeting

Project Charters and Work Teams: Incentives for Evaluation of Instruction Committee has the questions ready and the survey will be ready shortly to send out to the faculty. Please encourage all faculty to respond.

Room Design Strategic Initiative Project: We are currently on track.

SCTEA: 38 people attended the conference and 7 presented. Laura was very pleased with this turn out from TCTC.

TEE:  Ongoing; they are going to use appreciative inquiry to interview faculty and staff about the transformative employee experience.

The next meeting will be held on March 9 at noon.

The motion to end the meeting was made at 2:00 pm by Stacey Frank and seconded by Laura McClain.