Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Academic Leadership Team Minutes (4/9/19)


Members Present:       Gayle Arries, Tiffany Blackwell, Jackie Blakley, Tim Bowen, Jenni Creamer, Rick Cothran, Galen DeHay, Penny Edwards, Mandy Elmore, Adam Ghiloni, Glenn Hellenga, Linda Jameison, Tasheka Johnson, Scott Harvey, Gabe Hollingsworth, Tom Lawrence, Bryan Manuel, Mary Orem, Sarah Shumpert, Mia Tensley, Luke VanWingerden

Members Absent:        Mark Dougherty, Lynn Lewis, Chris Marino, Brian Swords

Other Attendees:         KC Bryson

Length of Meeting:     2 hours

The minutes of the January 8, 2019 meeting were approved as presented.

KC Bryson gave an overview of the Multiple Measures project and presented the results of her research.  She noted the following.

Reasons for the project:
·         ACT no longer supported COMPASS, so the college had to change to Accuplacer.
·         National studies show that placement tests are poor predictors of success in math and English courses.
·         The state is considering uniform cut scores.
·         Interest by faculty and staff to evaluate multiple measures.

The Multiple Measures task force started its work in January 2017.  It noted that unweighted GPA data to try to place students was fairly accurate (2.6 was pretty good, but a 2.8 showed better success), but they were not comfortable with using only GPA.  The team wanted to consider using high school transcripts, as well.  We did not receive high school transcripts until mid-June, so gathering information from those transcripts in time to make recommendations was difficult.

She discussed:
·         Pilot Minimum Qualifications
·         Why Math?
·         Why Bridge?
·         Examples of Pilot Success
·         Math Course Enrollment
·         Non-Bridge students

KC also touched on a few questions:
·         What is a good success rate?  Is ours too high?
·         The pilot had higher withdrawal rates.  Did we cause them to be less confident?

She also noted that it is important to get students to college level courses, because many who start in remedial courses, never make it out of them.

Multiple Measures Next Steps:
·         The team is still working to evaluate the pilot and next steps.
·         The second round of the pilot will need to solve the problem of the late transcripts.  
·         Several people have indicated that they would like to join the group.
·         We need to make a decision now about moving forward with the pilot. 
·         Probably will not include technical programs.
·         Will look at some other factors (attendance and Starfish alerts).

ACT has noted that non-traditional and adult learners do better with a refresher course.

With that report in mind, Galen ask the group these questions.

What key finding caught your attention?
·         Big picture success rate was better for non-pilot students until you dig deeper.
·         Jumping levels –how do we provide support?
·         We need to do better.  We are putting students behind.  They are paying real costs in money and success.

What is different than what we have been doing in the placement assistance room?
·         More objective
·         More formal process
·         More structured

What do we need to consider as we move forward?
·         How to do this in Banner?
·         Practicality – transcript timing
·         Program vs. course level placement
·         # of years out of school
·         Sophistication of the advising conversation

Galen noted that, as we discuss program readiness, there are other things in the works that we need to consider as we prepare strategic initiatives.  We need to use that information to guide how we move forward.

With three years of conversation about common cut scores, we need to be aware and anticipate what is coming.  We need to know what we want to do, rather than have to conform to a mandate.

Scott Harvey discussed the Maximum Student Load policy.  The revised policy gives the advisor the ability to approve the load.  The policy was approved.  It was noted that the student needs to know the implications, and that the procedure may address some issues.  A work group comprised of Tasheka Johnson, Mia Tensley, Scott Harvey and a faculty senate representative will review the procedure.


Announcements:

Jenni Creamer reported that Tasheka Johnson will now supervise the student success coaches.

Mandy Elmore reported that Jason Poole is the new Industrial Electronics Technology program director.

Luke VanWingerden reported that between August 2 – 9, the college will transition to BlackBoard Saas.  Justin Baggott will be communicating this to employees.

With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

Recorded By:             Anne Bryan

Next Meeting:             Tuesday, April 23 @ 1:00, in RH 220A