Monday, April 15, 2013

Provost's Council Minutes (2/26/13)


Provost’s Council
February 26, 2013
2:00 p.m.
Ruby Hicks Hall, Room 245
(Revised March 26, 2013)


Members Present:     Doug Allen, Jackie Blakley, Amanda Blanton, Tim Bowen, Scott Harvey, Dan Holland, Lynn Lewis, Robin McFall, Amoena Norcross, Sarah Shumpert, Brian Swords
Members Absent:     
Others Present:          Kevin Steele, Rob Massey
Length of Meeting:   2.5 hours
Topics Discussed:

The Minutes of the February 7, 2013 meeting were approved, as presented.

Rob Massey discussed advising and noted that the revised advising model is still a work in progress.  In the future, we may use developmental advising that will emphasize more frequent connections to students and will help establish relationships with the students.  The advising model will be a hybrid involving both success coaches and faculty advisors.  Success coaches will address aspects of developmental advising. 

Kevin Steele and Brian Swords discussed the fall enrollment plan.  Kevin distributed several handouts and explained how the target figures were determined.  Kevin will send the regression model to Anne to distribute to the group.  A funnel report will be prepared every month until May, and in May, it will be prepared weekly.  ISIS report 258 will show the number of sections needed.  Department heads need to vet out what is scheduled and look at the enrollment projections to see how it pans out.  Report 258 is as accurate as it can be, and starts over each year.  This will be messy, at first, but it is a great start, and we will continue to refine it with input. 

Action items from the Fall Enrollment discussion:

 
1.      All members of Provost’s Council will get a copy of the auto regression model to the program level.

 

2.      Vet the current schedule to compare courses to Report 258.

 

3.      Funnel report will be provided monthly until May, then weekly.

 

4.      Continue to study retention and persistence, and continue to refine reports and models.

 

Scott Harvey noted that the new combined academic calendar has been posted on the website.  It shows priority dates for financial aid, residency, and admissions.


Galen discussed the Strategic Plan and distributed the 2013-2014 Quarterly Calendar of Accomplishments, with the project owners listed.  Galen reviewed the project owners and asked for additional input.  The following project owners were revised.
 

Driving Organizational Success Through Our People – July – Sept. 2013, A faculty/staff competency model is established – Sharon – the group wanted to include a dean in this project.
 

Embracing Personal Accountability for Students’ Learning – July - September 2013, Transformative student experience is defined – Dr. Booth - the group wanted to add the Provost and the credit deans to this project.


The project owner will convene the group and document the deliverables.  Once deliverables are vetted out the owners begin with whatever is needed, a feasibility study, a project charter, or some other action.  By the March budget discussions, we should have a good estimate of the cost of the project.  Galen needs to know the general costs and the general idea in order to fold it into the budget, and he will be the repository for project documents.  New projects and deliverables will be reviewed by the Institutional Effectiveness staff to be certain there is no duplication. Then they will be forwarded to Executive Staff for review and approval.

 
The roll out strategy for the strategic plan will include Connection messages and group discussions.  The intent is for consistent, quality communication with chances for engagement at all campuses. 

 
Galen noted the upcoming budget sessions.  A separate session is planned for project owners.  The intent is for the budget process to be as clear and concise as possible, with access to resources.

 
Galen discussed employee performance management and distributed a handout.  The handout was an overview of the definitions and examples of the three ratings.  The document is meant to clarify the overall ratings and to address inconsistencies in the application of the EPMS rating system. The group made simple revisions to the document, but noted concern about how student success fits into the EPMS.  The group also noted the concern that the EPMS rating is tied to performance pay.  Galen assured the group that this is not the case, but the perception is still prevalent.  Galen also noted the new focus on how activities from one unit of the college can impact another.  The members of the group will review the handout and e-mail any feedback to Galen. 


With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

 

Recorded by:             Anne Bryan

 

Next Meeting:            Tuesday, March 26, at 2:00 p.m., in CD 142