Faculty Senate Minutes
Date: 3/14/2011
Location: CD 142
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Members Present: Katy Goforth, Jimmy Walker, Marilyn Vickery, Jennifer Beattie, Donna Shannon, Amoena Norcross, Penny Edwards, Matt Woodall, Phil Smith, Susan Curtis, John Woodson
Members Absent: Keri Catalfomo, Yvonne Vinson, Deborah Brock, Marla Roberson, Scott Brabham
Guests: N/A
Presider: Katy Goforth
Approval of Minutes:
Approved with the following changes:
· Number 1. Budget restrictions for college:
first sentence: “thought; therefore, no formal…”
Next sentence: “Everyone is encouraged …”
· Number 3. First Day of Class Attendance:
First sentence: “…policy in place that allowed…on the first day of the class
meeting.”
Third sentence: “The discussion led to…”
· Number 4. Faculty Senate Presence:
Fourth sentence: “…notify faculty of senator elections, duties, and activities.”
· Number 5. Faculty Choice Award:
Last sentence: “…at the March 14 meeting.”
1. Issue discussed and major points of discussion:
Katy asked if the e-mail had been received regarding where the form for students to change their major was located.
Amoena said she was unable to find it in either the faculty tab or the student tab.
Katy reiterated that students should be advised to go to student records for the form, but that it is under the faculty tab.
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
No further action.
2. Issue discussed and major points of discussion: Faculty Scholarships
Katy said there was $2,089.50 available for a scholarship. The scholarship would be given in the amount of $1,200.00 so there would only be one scholarship awarded. At our next meeting a recipient will be selected. If anyone would like to serve on the selection committee they need to respond to her by e-mail by April 1st.
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
Next meeting.
3. Issue discussed and major points of discussion: Electing a new Faculty Senate President
All nominees must be full time faculty now serving on the current Faculty Senate. There are no term limits. Katy will take nominations any time between now and April 15th, but asks that no one is nominated without their prior knowledge.
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
The actual vote will be on May 3rd. Voting through e-mail is a possibility.
4. Issue discussed and major points of discussion: Attendance Policy
Katy presented a list of questions from Marla voicing concerns regarding the proposed attendance policy whereby students who do not attend the first day of class would be dropped. It does not seem that they feel this is a student responsibility.
Phil noted that keeping up with enrollment, how this impacts financial aid, whether they will be dropped from one or all classes, and other logistical problems would need to be worked out by others. Implementation would not be our responsibility. We would just be making a recommendation for the policy.
Feedback from divisions:
I&ET – everyone was for it.
HE – we basically do this already.
BS – some yes, some feel it’s too complicated, some are against.
A&S – Lots of personal feedback, but no major problems with the idea. The
feedback was mostly stating what individuals would want specifically.
Donna Shannon, from Dental, was asked to bring a copy of their attendance policy to the next meeting to use as a possible template. It was agreed that whatever policy is adopted, it needs to be the same campus-wide.
Also discussed was how this would impact “making” classes and how cancelling a class after the first day of class creates a real problem for students and faculty.
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
We will forward our recommendations as written to academic delivery. Their next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday of spring break, so the meeting following that one on April 12th, Katy will take it forward.
Katy will respond to the specific questions directly.
5. Issue discussed and major points of discussion: “Making” Classes
Discussion was continued regarding what the actual policy is now for cancelling a class due to not enough students.
Jim mentioned he had a class that he knew quite a while beforehand only had six students, but the class was not cancelled and the students were not notified until the class actually met. This created a lot of difficulty for the students trying to reschedule their classes at the last minute.
Right now, whether or not a class is cancelled for this reason depends on whether the person teaching the class is full time or part time. Although 12 students is the normal minimum, if the full time teachers have an “average” over all classes that meets this minimum, the class will not be cancelled.
John felt we should not mention numbers. There could be a conflict of interest issue if an instructor did not drop students until the class was established in order to maintain the minimum number.
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
Consensus was if someone such as Katy asked about what the general practice is now, just out of curiosity, we would be less likely to create a problem.
6. Issue discussed and major points of discussion: : Flu Shots
A faculty member asked that it be brought up to the Senate why we do not offer flu shots for students when we do for faculty. This has been an issue because illness has impacted our attendance so much this Fall and Spring.
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
Katy will email this question to Dr. Buckhiester.
8. Issue discussed and major points of discussion: Clemson Life
John was curious about why we have Clemson Life students attending Tri-County when they are unable to function at even the most basic level.
Other students who cannot pass ENG 031 are steered into the Adult Education programs.
It was mentioned that mandatory placement was voted down.
We do have standards of progress where the student may attempt to pass three times only.
Another point made was that faculty were not really prepared to deal with these types of issues in the classroom.
The Clemson Life website states that it is a certification program taught by their faculty; so, why are these students at Tri County?
Action to be taken as a result of discussion, person(s) responsible, and timeline:
Katy will check into this privately as an aside.
Next meeting date, time, and location:
April 18, 1:30 p.m., CD 142
Name of Recorder: Marilyn Vickery