Provost’s Council
April 14, 2015
10:00 a.m.
Ruby Hicks Hall, Room 245
Members Present: Gayle
Arries, Dan Averette, Jackie Blakley, Tim Bowen, Jenni Creamer, ScottHarvey, Linda
Jameison, Lynn Lewis, Lou Ann Martin, Marla Roberson, Sarah Shumpert, Hap
Wheeler
Members Absent: Brian
Swords
Others Present: Margaret Burdette, Matt Edwards,
Chris Marino
Length of Meeting: 2.5 hours
Topics Discussed:
The March 10 meeting minutes were approved as
presented.
The March 24 meeting minutes
were approved with a minor revision.
Matt Edwards and Scott Harvey
discussed the Ticketing System.
The
TCTC Information Technology Service Catalog,
a college organizational chart, and an Academic Affairs ticket request flow
chart were distributed.
On the organizational
chart, Matt noted the proposed number of high/medium requests for each area
(Academic Affairs, Business Affairs, Executive and CCE) and will add Marketing
to the Academic Affairs unit.
The AA
flow chart was discussed at length.
The
following were noted.
·
Will
move the priority decision from the data coordinator to the Provost’s Council.
Provost’s Council members will negotiate priority based on need.
·
Transparency
is the big issue. How requests are
ranked should be transparent. Where they are in the process needs to be
communicated at the “Status Update” level.
·
May
be better to revise a current ISIS report than create a new one.
·
IT
continues to explore other reporting solutions that may help address the
priority of requests.
·
Keep
in mind the limited resources (programmers) in IT. Programmers are assigned to their strongest
areas.
·
Review
process does not have a “No” direction on the chart. Need to clarify that a “No” would be
considered a low priority. At
developer’s discretion to determine if a low priority could be addressed with a
high priority in the same area.
·
Each
request is a mini-project. Average
completion time for each request is 40 hours.
·
Need
to address transparency in the process.
Galen
asked the members of the group to send any questions or comments to Matt and
Scott. The target date for this new
review process is May.
Marla
noted that the Library Liaison program will start back up soon. This program needs one representative from
each area to allow cross-campus feedback and information. She will send an e-mail with that
request. Marla also stated that she will
send an e-mail with a list of serials for next year’s purchases. She asked the members of the group to review
the list for additions and deletions.
Mostly, the serials address an accreditation requirement. For her last
note, Marla mentioned that new Faculty Senate officers and representatives will
be elected soon. She distributed a
hand-out with notes on the election timeline and requirements.
Margaret
noted that the links in the online catalog are linking to old catalogs. She stressed that each link needs to be
reviewed and updated, if necessary. SACS
will review the online version of the catalog, so it must be correct. The college needs to address this issue long
range. The content owners have the
ability to make changes and updates, but with staffing issue, some owners do
not know they own a page. Gayle will
work with Jan Kempinski to work on this issue.
Galen
led the policies and procedures review.
He noted that revised procedures will be forwarded to Lisa Saxon in
Institutional Effectiveness. She will
post the procedure, along with the changes.
Kathy Brand will be responsible for posting policies and will handle
those the same way.
The
following is a brief overview of the groups’ review. Galen and Anne will revise as recommended by
the group. With minor revisions, the
following were approved.
1-1-1010.1
– Policy and Procedure Development and Review
3-2-1010.2
– Curriculum Development and Revision
3-1-1015
– Distance Learning (Policy)
3-1-4010.1
– Instructional Program Advisory Committees – Aligning with state policy. A new manual will accompany the revised
policy.
8-0-1010.1
– Academic Freedom
8-0-1020
– Personal Benefit from Projects or Written Materials (Policy) - Galen will
validate the excerpt from the law that is in the policy. Reflects HR and State ethics laws.
8-0-1021
– Intellectual Property Rights (Policy) – Recommend that we delete local
policy. Remove and use the state policy.
8-2-1000
– Secondary State Employment – Reflection of HR law.
8-2-1030.3
– Sponsoring College Activities – Linda is reviewing stipends. Will honor this year, but will refer to this
procedure when making any changes.
The
following procedure review was tabled.
8-4-1010.1
– Student Evaluation of Credit Courses and Faculty
Galen
distributed a proposed master Project Charter document. He asked the group to let him know of any
edits. He will present this to Executive
Staff soon.
Galen
reminded the group about FY’16 FTE requests.
Anne will compile and send a packet early next week.
He
also noted that the HIPs Phase II Project Charter is being developed. Pre-work will involve re-designing the
Instructional Support Office into a Curriculum Office. The curriculum design
and approval process will be under the Curriculum Office. Three curriculum revisions are underway
(Paralegal track in CRJ, MTA, and Supply Chain). Galen asked the group to hold any other
revisions until the transition is complete, hopefully in late summer. Chris noted that the deans may want to check
with their programs that are completing the academic program review.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Recorded By: Anne Bryan
Next Meeting: Monday,
May 18, at 2:30 p.m., in RH 245